Returning to ’90s, She Became Famous in Major Surgical Fields

  Medicine cannot provide 100% guarantee, which is reflected in the fact that many publicity of donations only stay in the aspect of moral publicity, and the technical defects are those that can be avoided if they can be avoided. Problematic people cannot be deceived. This is the most ridiculous point of all medical staff about this kind of propaganda strategy. You lie to the people and say that doing this has no side effects. Once they find out that it is not true, they will question everything you said and hate you to death.

   The propaganda says that now bone marrow transplantation is not about bone, but about peripheral blood hematopoietic stem cells. It is painless and has no risk. In fact, when each donor will get an informed consent form before they really want to donate, it will list all the risks for you and you will be responsible for the consequences. I got a lot of previously registered volunteers to scold people, and I didn\'t tell them about this in the previous propaganda.

  Why do medical staff have the deepest understanding of this kind of thing, because when the clinical explanation is not sufficient, they will often encounter a doctor who is told by the common people that you lied to me and then hates you.

  Human life is at stake. Human life is the first priority among ordinary people. How can you deceive people, you have to know that saying something less is all deceiving people in the common people\'s cognition.

  What is the final result, not to mention domestic and foreign bone marrow donation rates can reach more than 50%. Does this kind of propaganda make you feel like you can deceive one and count as one? It\'s simply a strategy of self-digging and smearing, and it\'s going to be black all the way. I don\'t know if it\'s propaganda asking people to donate or propaganda asking people not to donate.

   Donation is advocated or not, but definitely advocated. Many medical staff are registered volunteers and know that the risk to their own safety is very low, so why not do it if it can save lives. However, an important premise is that the donor must be a healthy person.

  Medical research is what healthy people donate to sick people. It is not acceptable for you to ask an unhealthy person to donate, and it is also irresponsible for the patient.

  If there is an accident that you don’t want to see, you need a specific scientific analysis of the specific case. A medical accident happens to be the unfortunate 0.01% that can\'t be helped, so the principle of voluntariness is even more necessary. Another kind of accident can be avoided, caused by irregular operation, the possibility of occurrence is higher, and it is the root cause of most cases.

  I don\'t understand anymore. For example, when she thanked her classmates for donating blood last time, all the teachers scratched their noses. You can show love. Please take responsibility for yourself first. If the donor\'s accident has serious consequences, it will affect the trust and confidence of the whole society in the cause of donation.

   For those who don’t understand, they will scold them. Anyone who understands the severity of this matter will not scold any medical staff or staff at the donation center. Forcing you to donate according to other people’s heads is like tying up people and using them as livestock. The social impact of an accident after donating is even more devastating. Like Ding Lulu last time, you can lure her to donate, but you can\'t force her to donate. If she doesn\'t regret the donation, she must be respected.

Where does    tough donation usually happen? relatives.

   To what extent can relatives be **** to force donations? How many people in the same family force the individual to donate, and if he/she does not donate, he/she will die. There must be a degree of sympathy for the weak, otherwise, it will form an even more terrible oppression of another weak.

   Thank you for your support! ! Good night dears~