Returning to ’90s, She Became Famous in Major Surgical Fields

  No wonder Mr. Yuan Fang just found the medical records here and thought about it by himself, and did not express his opinion for a long time.

I see. For example, Li Qi\'an, who could not see the problem before, finally understood where the "gold" discovered by Xie was.

   If you say this, are the researchers doing something wrong?

   First of all, this is the data collected in the database. Before citing the data in scientific research papers, it has little to do with scientific research, and at most it is used in today\'s teaching.

   Ordinary data collection is most likely pathological slices made by students for teachers. In the case of diagnosis, students temporarily cite the final diagnosis of the clinician as a label, which cannot be said to be completely wrong.

   "It\'s definitely not a myocardial infarction? I can\'t say it\'s completely ruled out now." Cao Yudong said again.

   For some intractable diseases with unclear medical history, it is too difficult to make a clear medical diagnosis, and in more cases it can only become a point of discussion in the medical circle.

  Unless the family members of the patients have follow-up needs for doctors to pursue the truth, then we can only wait for the doctors or researchers to suddenly have this interest or task needs, and then slowly and deeply explore this case. Who makes the scientific research and clinical work all too busy, and there are too many cases to deal with. What\'s more, the bosses all know that such a case is very likely to continue to fail to get the correct answer after discussing it round and round again.

   Maybe someone thought of a forensic doctor at this time. Whether the forensic science can completely solve the mystery of everyone\'s death. The answer is no.

   One of the foundations of forensic science is medicine. It is impossible for forensic doctors to make breakthroughs on their own when medicine fails to solve all medical mysteries.

Therefore, in the news, it will be found that there are some highly controversial cases, and everyone suspects that it is a murder case. In the end, the forensic doctor came to the conclusion that no conclusive evidence of the murder could be given. It can only be said that the patient died of an ordinary death Organ failure, etc.

   Having said that, Teacher Yuan Fang mentioned Xie\'s cautious style again: "She didn\'t say that it was not a myocardial infarction, but only said that it was not typical. She wanted to find out the medical records and check the general specimen."

  If the gross specimen and medical record can prove that it is myocardial infarction, this pathological section can become a special case in the pathological section of myocardial infarction, and it can be used as a valuable teaching material for atypical cases. So Xie\'s cautious suspicion is meaningful.

   "Is there a general specimen?" Cao Yudong asked his colleague.

   Teacher Yuan Fang said: "I\'m afraid this may not necessarily exist."

   Gross specimens are more difficult to preserve than sliced ​​specimens, occupying volume and consuming more resources. Not all organs of a body can be preserved as a gross specimen. Organs for gross specimens should be selected, and generally those with research value are selected for preservation. Moreover, in the process of preservation, some general specimens can only be eliminated if there is a problem with some unpredictable factors for many years.

   In a word, scientific research institutes do these things, and it is very expensive to do research with dead people.

  If there is no gross specimen, we can only rely on the fragmentary data that we have so far if we want to continue to explore this case.

   said that the biggest feature of this pathological section is a large piece of myocardial fibrosis. If you remember Xiao Shugang\'s case, it was mentioned that ischemia leads to the death of myocardial cells and turns into cardiac scars, which refers to myocardial fibrosis.